Archaeologists from The Field Museum in Chicago,
IL and Shandong University (Jinan, China) have investigated the historical
processes leading up to China's political unification through the juxtaposition
of macro- and micro-scale analysis. The study offers new perspectives on how
human impacts of infrastructural investments, interactive technologies, social
contracts, and ideologies that were implemented during the Qin and Han
Dynasties and before have helped establish the rough spatial configuration of
what is today China.
Why humans cooperate in large social groupings
is a key question for contemporary research. Thus, the repeated historical
renegotiation of China's continent-scale political consolidations remains a
scholarly focus after more than a generation of attention.
"Two millennia ago, Rome and the Han
dominated their respective regions," said Gary M. Feinman, MacArthur
Curator of Anthropology at The Field Museum. "While the two were roughly
equal in their spatial extents at their peaks, the bounds of the Roman Empire
were never historically reconstituted. In contrast, Chinese regions were
reintegrated perpetually into one political unit. Why is that?"
Feinman and his colleagues question the widely
advanced perspective that China's reunifications were simply due to the
periodic threats from nomadic peoples to its north. While this view is not
entirely discounted, the authors argue that the persistent reunifications were
in part the consequence of social and economic actions that were taken during
the Bronze and Iron Ages prior, during, and just after China's first
unification under the Qin emperor.
The study used two distinct sets of data: first,
the authors drew on documents that mostly pertain to the macro-scale.
Beginning with the aristocratic Shang rule in
the second millennium B.C., the authors cite precocious developments in
urbanization, high-intensity metal production and early writing as a few of the
cultural practices of the region that were later adopted by the Zhou, who were
the first to consolidate a large part of central China. Writings by Confucius
during this time period typify a shift in leadership and governance from
aristocratic forms to more explicit moral codes and defined social expectations
for all.
Eventually, centralized authority largely broke
down, leaving 5-10 formerly vassal states to vie for control during the Warring
States era (453-221 B.C.). One of these local polities, the Qin state, began an
episode of conquest that culminated in China's political unification. Changes
set in motion during these times underpinned a national identity and the course
of subsequent Chinese history.
For example, numerous roads were built, river
transport was improved, and efforts were made to connect the walls that had
been built at the northern limits of three of the warring states. Once linked,
they became China's Great Wall.
Following a short period of Qin rule, dynastic
power shifted to the Han, who maintained many of the unifying initiatives of
the Qin. Ultimately the Han Dynasty produced political, social and ideological
foundations for empire that have endured for more than a millennium.
The team also analyzed the results of an 18-year
systematic archaeological settlement pattern study that they implemented in a
small region on the coast of the Shandong Province.
"China's first great wall, the Great Wall
of the Qi state, was built east-to-west across much of what is today Shandong
Province," said Feinman. "It defined the southern limits of the Qi
polity, which was the last of the warring states to be engulfed by the Qin
armies before unification. We were able to follow the easternmost extension of
the Qi wall for 50 kilometers as it ran across the northern limits of our study
region. Based on our survey, the political border that the wall demarcated in
the Warring States period likely had been a kind of boundary for more than
1,500 years."
Eventually, the wall was breached and the Qin
defeated the Qi state, resulting in China's first episode of unification."
Our perspective draws on data from the early history of China through its first
episode of unification to offer an alternative perspective as to why China has
reunified several times subsequently at a more or less comparable scale,"
said Feinman.
The study concludes that the globally unmatched
tendency for China to be politically unified so repeatedly was in large part
the consequence of social constructions; of a mixture of political ideals,
institutional structures and relations, unified communication technologies,
commerce networks, and collective traditions and memories negotiated and
adopted during the Shang, Zhou, Qin, and Han eras.
No comments:
Post a Comment