Saturday, September 27, 2025

Ancient fishing nets resurrected from pottery

 

Reconstruction of 6,000-year-old Jomon fishing nets sheds light on prehistoric sustainability practices

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Kumamoto University

Shizunai-Nakano style pottery (top) showing net impressions, with reconstructed knot structures and reproductions (bottom) 

image: 

X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to examine and digitally reconstruct net impressions preserved in pottery from the Hidaka region of Hokkaido, Japan, dating to the Early Jomon period (referred to as ‘Shizunai-Nakano style pottery’). This study revealed that fishing nets were (re)used in various ways during pottery production. Differences in thread twist direction, knotting methods, and mesh size provide insights into the nets’ functions and the cultural practices of the time—shedding light on the importance of net-making in prehistoric Japan.

Figure reproduced from Obata & Lee, 2025, Journal of Archaeological Science, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

view more 

Credit: Hiroki Obata, Kumamoto University

In a groundbreaking archaeological achievement, researchers from Kumamoto University have successfully reconstructed the structure of prehistoric fishing nets from the Jomon period (ca. 14,000–900 BCE) by analyzing impressions preserved in ancient pottery using advanced X-ray computed tomography (CT). This marks the first time in the world that nets from over 6,000 years ago have been digitally and physically resurrected in such detail.

Led by Professor Emeritus Hiroki Obata from Faculty of Humanities And Social Sciences, Kumamoto University, the team examined pottery unearthed from sites in Hokkaido and Kyushu—regions in northern and southern Japan respectively—where ancient net impressions remained hidden inside and on the surfaces of ceramic fragments. By using high-resolution X-ray CT imaging alongside silicone cast replication techniques, the researchers visualized and reconstructed the nets’ intricate structures, including thread twists, knot types, and mesh sizes.

The study revealed a rich diversity in net-making techniques between regions. In northern Japan’s Hokkaido region, large-mesh nets with tightly tied "reef knots" were found embedded in the clay coils of so-called Shizunai-Nakano style pottery. These nets, believed to have been used for ocean fishing, were then repurposed as structural core materials in pottery making—a practice suggesting the early reuse and recycling of tools.

In contrast, pottery from the southern Kyushu region, dating to the Final Jomon and early Yayoi periods (ca. 3,200–2,800 years ago), contained fine-mesh nets tied with simpler overhand knots or using “knotted wrapping” methods. These nets likely served as molds or release agents during pottery production and may have originally been used as bags.

Remarkably, the study also estimated the labor involved in net production, suggesting that crafting a single fishing net could take more than 85 hours—highlighting the value of these tools and the cultural importance of their reuse. “This reuse of materials reflects an early form of sustainability, akin to today’s SDGs,” said Prof. Obata.

The findings challenge previous assumptions that all net impressions represented fishing gear and demonstrate that not all preserved impressions can be interpreted as functional nets. Instead, the nets appear to have had multiple lives—first as tools for fishing or carrying, and later as integral elements in the creation of pottery.

This world-first study, published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, not only reconstructs ancient technology but also opens new doors for identifying and preserving other vanished organic materials in archaeological contexts.

3000-year-old copper smelting site could be key to understanding the origins of iron

 Research from Cranfield University sheds new light onto the transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age, showing how experimentation with iron-rich rocks by copper smelters may have sparked the invention of iron.

The work reanalysed metallurgical remains from a site in southern Georgia: a 3000-year-old smelting workshop called Kvemo Bolnisi. During the original analysis in the 1950s, piles of hematite (an iron oxide mineral) and slag (a waste product of the metal production) were found in the workshop. Finding those iron oxides, the original excavators thought the workshop was an early iron smelting site.

However, new research shows that those assumptions were wrong. Rather than iron, workers at Kvemo Bolnisi were smelting copper using iron oxide as a flux - a substance added into the furnace to increase the resulting copper yield.

These discoveries give weight to a long-discussed theory that iron was invented by copper smelters. This evidence shows that ancient copper metalworkers experimented with iron-bearing materials in a metallurgical furnace, which was a crucial step towards iron smelting.

The importance of iron

While the Iron Age marked the beginnings of widespread iron production, the metal itself wasn’t a new discovery. Iron artefacts have been found dating from the Bronze Age, most famously an iron dagger with a gold and rock crystal hilt from the tomb of Egyptian king Tutankhamun. But the earliest iron objects were forged from naturally occurring metallic iron found in meteorites, not extracted from iron ore through smelting. That rarity meant iron was, at that point in history, more valuable than gold.

The development of extractive iron metallurgy changed all this. Iron is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, even though naturally occurring iron metal is very rare. The ability to extract iron from iron ore and work it into useful materials such as tools or weapons is one of the defining technological transformations in human history. The transition into the Iron Age was far from instantaneous, but it gave rise to the iron-wielding armies of Assyria and Rome and later the railroads and steel-frame buildings of the industrial revolution.

Dr Nathaniel Erb-Satullo, Visiting Fellow in Archaeological Science at Cranfield University, said: “Iron is the world’s quintessential industrial metal, but the lack of written records, iron’s tendency to rust, and a lack of research on iron production sites has made the search for its origins challenging.

“That’s what makes this site at Kvemo Bolnisi so exciting. It’s evidence of intentional use of iron in the copper smelting process. That shows that these metalworkers understood iron oxide - the geological compounds that would eventually be used as ore for iron smelting - as a separate material and experimented with its properties within the furnace. Its use here suggests that this kind of experimentation by copper-workers was crucial to development of iron metallurgy.

“There’s a beautiful symmetry in this kind of research, in that we can use the techniques of modern geology and materials science to get into the minds of ancient materials scientists. And we can do all this through the analysis of slag—a mundane waste material that looks like lumps of funny-looking rock.”

The research was supported by grants from the British Institute of Ankara, the Gerda Henkel Foundation, and the American Research Institute of the South Causcasus. The research paper Iron in copper metallurgy at the dawn of the Iron Age: Insights on iron invention from a mining and smelting site in the Caucasus is published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106338

Friday, September 26, 2025

Why did Neanderthals go to the beach?

 




An international study, published in the journal Scientific Reports by Nature Publishing Group, has revealed a new Neanderthal site in the south of the Iberian Peninsula, on the Algarve coast of Portugal. More specifically, it describes the first traces of Neanderthal hominids in Portugal, representing a significant advance in our understanding of the human presence on the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula during the period known as the Pleistocene.

The work is led by Carlos Neto de Carvalho, geologist and palaeontologist at IDL-University of Lisbon and scientific coordinator of the Naturtejo UNESCO Global Geopark, with the participation of Fernando Muñiz Guinea, professor in the Department of Crystallography, Mineralogy and Agricultural Chemistry at the University of Seville. The study has also benefited from contributions from other universities and research centres in Portugal, Spain, Gibraltar, Italy, Denmark and China. It is an "interdisciplinary study on the ecological and behavioural analysis of the fossilised footprint record in southern Portugal," say Neto de Carvalho and Fernando Muñiz.

A unique window into everyday behaviour
The first Neanderthal footprints in Portugal were discovered in two different locations in the Algarve: Praia do Monte Clérigo, in rocks dating back some 78,000 years, and Praia do Telheiro, dating back 82,000 years. At Monte Clérigo, 5 tracks and 26 footprints have been identified, left by adults and children just over a year old on a steep slope of what was once a coastal dune. At Praia do Telheiro, an isolated footprint attributed to a teenager or adult female has been discovered, associated with other fossilised footprints of birds typical of coastal and rocky environments.

The study of Neanderthal footprints offers several unique and complementary advantages over other types of archaeological remains, such as bones or tools. These footprints, preserved in sediments or sedimentary rocks, constitute a direct record of the behaviour at a specific moment in time of the Neanderthals who produced them. The footprints show the physical presence of a Neanderthal in a specific place, unlike artefacts, which may have been transported or abandoned. 

"Footprints record a specific moment, almost instantaneously, allowing us to reconstruct what was happening; for example, a group walk, a chase, a flight, or presence in a particular landscape. The footprints show how Neanderthals used space, how they explored coastal environments, forests, dunes or riverbanks, something that is difficult to infer solely from artefacts," argue Neto de Carvalho and Muñiz. 

Through the number, size and arrangement of the footprints, it is possible to infer the minimum number of individuals present, their age range (children, adolescents, adults) or the possible division of tasks (e.g. a hunting party). Children and babies, who rarely leave archaeological traces, can be identified by their footprints (which are smaller), revealing more about the social structure: "footprints offer a unique and dynamic window into everyday behaviour: a snapshot of life tens of thousands of years ago," explain the authors.

The footprints studied by the research team indicate locomotion strategies adapted to the terrain, suggesting route planning, proximity to the camp, possible hunting behaviour and coexistence with other species. For example, one of the tracks shows the interaction between human footprints and those of a deer produced simultaneously, reinforcing the hypothesis of pursuit or ambush practices in a dune context.

A diet rich in deer, horses and hares
The research also uses ecological network analysis based on mathematical network theory to relate data from other known coastal archaeological sites in the Iberian Peninsula, confirming that the Neanderthal diet in these regions consisted mainly of deer, horses and hares, complemented by marine and coastal resources, indicating a diversified dietary strategy.

These new findings demonstrate that Neanderthals were more versatile and ecologically and cognitively adapted to coastal environments than previously believed, offering exceptional insight into their behaviour, mobility and social organisation.

 

Digital reconstruction reveals Yunxian 2 crania as early member of Homo long

 A digital reconstruction of the nearly one-million-year-old Yunxian 2 cranium from China, which corrected previous distortions inherent in the fossil, suggests it belonged to the Asian Homo longi clade. This means the cranium represents an early branch of the sister lineage to modern humans that may have included the enigmatic Denisovans. 

Fossil evidence shows that, during the Middle Pleistocene, multiple Homo lineages with diverse physical forms coexisted. Much of what is known about human evolution and archaic hominins relies on fossil skulls. Yet many specimens from this era are damaged and/or deformed, leading to uncertainties concerning species interpretations. For example, the Yunxian crania from China date back nearly a million years and exhibit a mosaic of primitive traits resembling Homo erectus alongside features suggestive of later species, such as Homo sapiens. However, because one of these skulls, Yunxian 2, was highly distorted, its evolutionary position has long been uncertain. 

Using advanced CT scanning and digital reconstruction techniques, Xiaobo Feng and colleagues corrected the compression and distortions in the Yunxian 2 crania. According to Feng et al., phylogenetic analyses incorporating the reconstructed Yunxian 2 crania revealed a mix of previously unknown primitive and derived traits, suggesting that the fossil belongs to the Asian H.  longi clade – a sister group to Homo sapiens, which likely included the Denisovans. Individuals within the H. longi clade exhibit distinctive traits, including a larger braincase, narrower spacing between the eyes, a more pronounced glabellar depression, and a lower, elongated frontal bone, which are characteristics clearly visible in the Yunxian 2 fossil. 

The authors also show that Yunxian fossils are likely the oldest within the longi clade, though not the most basal. Given the fossil’s blend of primitive traits from earlier humans and more derived features shared with H. longi and H. sapiens, Feng et al. suggest that the Yunxian group may represent a transitional form, capturing an early phase of rapid diversification within these lineages.

Were early humans hunters — or hunted?


For decades, researchers believed that Homo habilis — the earliest known species in our genus — marked the moment humans rose from prey to predators. They were thought to be the first stone tool users and among the earliest meat eaters and hunters based on evidence from early archaeological sites.

But fossils of another early human species — African Homo erectus — show they lived alongside H. habilis about 2 million years ago. That raised a new mystery: Which of these two species was actually making tools and eating the meat of hunted animals? Most anthropologists long suspected H. habilis was responsible, which would have placed them in a dominant predatory role. 

New findings from a team led by Rice University anthropologist Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo, in  partnership between Rice and the Archaeological and Paleontological Museum of Madrid through the Institute of Evolution in Africa (IDEA), which he co-directs with Enrique Baquedano, challenge that view, revealing that these early humans were still preyed upon by carnivores, likely leopards. The work is published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

“We discovered that these very early humans were eaten by other carnivores instead of mastering the landscape at that time,” Domínguez-Rodrigo said.

The breakthrough was made possible by applying artificial intelligence (AI) to fossil analysis, giving researchers insights they could not have reached with traditional methods alone. Domínguez-Rodrigo is among the first anthropologists to use AI for taxon-specific analysis of bone surface damage — training computer vision models to recognize the microscopic tooth mark patterns left by different predators.

“Human experts have been good at finding modifications on prehistoric bones,” he said. “But there were too many carnivores at that time. AI has opened new doors of understanding.”

His team trained deep learning models to distinguish bone damage left by leopards, lions, hyenas, crocodiles and wolves. When the models analyzed marks on H. habilis fossils from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, they consistently identified leopard bite marks with high confidence.

“AI is a game changer,” Domínguez-Rodrigo said. “It’s pushing methods that have been stable for 40 years beyond what we imagined. For the first time, we can pinpoint not just that these humans were eaten but by whom.”

The finding challenges a long-standing idea about when and what type of humans began to dominate their environment, showing that even as their brains were beginning to grow, they were still vulnerable.

“The beginning of the human brain doesn’t mean we mastered everything immediately,” Domínguez-Rodrigo said. “This is a more complex story. These early humans, these Homo habilis, were not the ones responsible for that transformation.”

He said it’s a reminder that human evolution wasn’t a single leap from prey to predator but a long, gradual climb and that H. habilis may not have been the turning point researchers once believed.

Domínguez-Rodrigo added that the methods developed for this study could unlock discoveries across anthropology, allowing researchers to analyze other early human fossils in new ways. The work is part of a growing collaboration between Rice and IDEA, where his team is based.

“This is a pioneer center in the use of artificial intelligence to the past,” he said. “It’s one of the first places using AI for paleontological and anthropological research.” 

Domínguez-Rodrigo said he hopes this discovery is just the beginning. By applying AI to other fossils, he believes researchers can map when humans truly rose from prey to predator and uncover new chapters in our evolutionary story that have long been hidden.

“It’s extremely stimulating to be the first one to see something for the first time. When you uncover sites that have been hidden from the human eye for more than 2 million years, you’re contributing to how we reconstruct who we are. It’s a privilege and very encouraging.”

The study was co-authored by Marina Vegara Riquelme and Enrique Baquedano, and was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, the Spanish Ministry of Universities and the Spanish Ministry of Culture.

Thursday, September 25, 2025

IPK research team reveals the mosaic origin of barley

The cultivation of barley began well before humans settled permanently - around 10,000 years ago, during the Neolithic Revolution

The research team conducted an in-depth study of the evolution and domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare). They focused on so-called haplotypes - sections of DNA that are inherited together and act like genetic “building blocks.” To trace barley’s history, the scientists analysed the genetic material of 682 barley accessions from the IPK genebank and 23 archaeological barley finds, including ancient charred grains up to 6,000 years old.

The team specifically studied 380 wild barley samples from regions across western and central Asia, and compared them with 302 samples of domesticated barley. Their goal: to determine where and when key haplotypes were introduced into barley’s genome.

“Barley does not come from a single origin, as long time assumed,” says Yu Guo, first author of the study. “Instead, its genome is a fascinating mosaic composed of contributions from five wild barley populations we studied in the Fertile Crescent and neighbouring areas.” The Fertile Crescent is considered the birthplace of agriculture, stretching from modern-day Iraq through Turkey to Israel.

The cultivation of barley in this region began well before humans settled permanently - around 10,000 years ago, during the Neolithic Revolution - and continued for thousands of years. “Some of the haplotypes essential for domestication, like the one for the non-brittle ear (so the grain doesn’t fall off the plant), appeared as early as 27,000 years ago, long time before we see archaeological evidence of domesticated barley,” Yu Guo adds.

Barley’s spread beyond the Fertile Crescent was not straightforward. “This expansion was shaped by repeated gene flow between local wild populations and already domesticated barley varieties - as well as by human migration and trade. This greatly influenced today’s genetic diversity,” says Dr. Martin Mascher, Head of the Domestication Genomics research group at the IPK. All five wild barley populations examined contributed, though to different extents, to the gene pool of cultivated barley.

As agriculture spread from the Fertile Crescent about 8,500 years ago, domesticated barley split into three main lineages: A western lineage (Middle East and Europe), an eastern lineage (Central and East Asia) and an Ethiopian lineage. Important genes associated with domestication traits - such as the non-brittle ear, six-row barley, or naked barley (grain without a hull) - originated at different times and in different regions. For instance, the mutation for naked barley arose approximately 16,000 years ago.

Analysis of ancient DNA, especially from archaeological sites in Israel, added further insight. Barley grains from the Yoram Cave (6,000 years old), the Abi'or Cave (2,000 years old) and a copper mine near Timna (3,000 years old) showed that genetic diversity increased over time, likely due to gene flow from other regions - driven by trade and human movement.

“These discoveries strengthen and add a genomic dimension to our findings of the 23,000-year-old cereal agriculture at the Ohalo site, on the shores of the Sea of Galilee. Together they show that this region was central to plants’ domestication and underscore that our exceptionally well-preserved dry archaeological record is a rare botanical and genetic treasure trove that now opens the way to fresh lines of research and to questions that until recently were considered unsolvable,” says Prof. Ehud Weiss, Head of the Archaeobotanical Lab. at Bar Ilan University.

This new view of barley’s past helps researchers understand how crops adapt to different environments. Traits such as grain retention or ear shape evolved multiple times independently. “Our study shows how closely human history is linked with the history of cultivated plants,” says Dr. Martin Mascher. “Reading the DNA of barley is like reading several thousand years of human civilisation.”

 

Friday, September 19, 2025

Early humans may have walked from Türkiye to mainland Europe

 Continuous landmasses, now submerged, may have made it possible for early humans to cross between present-day Turkiye and Europe, new landmark research of this largely unexplored region reveals.  

The findings, published today in the peer-reviewed Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, unveil a previously undocumented Paleolithic presence in Ayvalık and more importantly could redocument our species’ migration into the continent.  

It has long been thought that Homosapien reached Europe primarily coming via the Balkans and the Levant, from Africa into the Middle East. 

However, with this new discovery of 138 lithic artifacts at 10 sites, across a region of 200km², the suggestion is that long before its olive groves and seaside charm, the northeastern Aegean coast of Ayvalık (now Turkey) was in fact another route for early humans navigating a changing prehistoric world.  

“Our archaeological discovery has unveiled that this now-idyllic region once potentially offered a vital land bridge for human movement during the Pleistocene era—when sea levels dropped and the now-submerged landscape was briefly exposed,” explains Dr Göknur Karahan, from the Department of Archaeology-Prehistory, at Hacettepe University, in Turkey, who was part of a fully female team of expert archaeologists from the country.  

“We are very excited and delighted with this discovery. These findings mark Ayvalık as a potential new frontier in the story of human evolution, placing it firmly on the map of human prehistory – opening up a new possibility for how early humans may have entered Europe.  

“It feels like we are adding an entirely new page to the story of human dispersal. Our research raises exciting possibilities for future exploration, and we hope it emerges as a body of work that will shift the approach of Pleistocene archaeology for decades to come.” 

 

How were these findings possible? 

During the Ice Age, sea levels dropped by more than 100 meters, exposing vast coastal plains that are now under water. At that time, today’s islands and peninsulas of Ayvalık would have in fact been part of a continuous landmass, forming a natural bridge between Anatolia and Europe.  
 
The tools found in this current discovery are right along the present-day coastline and mark evidence of people living and moving across these now-lost landscapes. 

Factors like environmental processes and the depth of deposits have previously limited the ability to detect and preserve remains in Ayvalık. 
 
“In all these periods, the present-day islands and peninsulas of Ayvalık would have formed interior zones within an expansive terrestrial environment,” explains co-author Professor Kadriye Özçelik, from Ankara University. 

“These paleogeographic reconstructions underscore the importance of the region for understanding hominin dispersals across the northeastern Aegean during the Pleistocene.” 
 

What was found? 
 
The region’s shifting geology and active coastlines in the North Aegean made preservation difficult and the number of items uncovered “limited”, however this research team managed to uncover Levallois technologies from various Paleolithic periods, as well as handaxes and cleavers.  
 
Among the most significant finds include Levallois-style flake tools, sophisticated implements linked to the Middle Paleolithic Mousterian tradition – these are often associated with Neanderthals and early Homosapiens. 
 
“These large cutting tools are among the most iconic artefacts of the Paleolithic and are instantly recognizable even today, so are a very important find,” explains Dr Karahan. 
 
“The presence of these objects in Ayvalık is particularly significant, as they provide direct evidence that the region was part of wider technological traditions shared across Africa, Asia, and Europe.”  
 
Describing the initial discovery of the 131 items, Dr Karahan adds: “It was a truly unforgettable moment for us. Holding the first tools in our hands was both emotional and inspiring. 

“And each find from there on was a moment of excitement for the whole team.  

“Holding these objects —after walking across landscapes where no one had ever documented Paleolithic remains before— was unforgettable.” 

 
What does this discovery tell us about early humans? 
 
The experts’ key argument hinges on the potential of Ayvalık as a dynamic site for interaction and exchange, facilitating early human movement between the Anatolia peninsula and Europe.  

Exploring how Anatolia, with specific focus on Ayvalık, and Europe were linked during glacial sea-level low stands offers alternative pathways for how early humans moved around the region beyond dominantly emphasised northern mainland-centred routes. 

Addressing a gap in the scholarship, the authors’ work provides a new foundation for examining resources and migration routes in which Ayvalık may have featured as part of a mobility corridor. 

The survey’s yield of tools demonstrates a “consistent use of Levallois technology and flake production… and a diversified toolkit,” whilst all artefacts together offer what the team state are “valuable insights into early human presence, raw material preferences, and technological variability”. 

“The findings paint a vivid picture of early human adaptation, innovation, and mobility along the Aegean,” Dr Karahan explains. 

“The results confirmed that Ayvalık – which had never before been studied for its Paleolithic potential – holds vital traces of early human activity.” 

 

Incredible recoveries, hundreds of thousands of years later 

 
As this was a survey (carried out across a two-week period in June 2022) rather than an excavation, the team could not be certain of what they would find when they set off. They knew from the region’s geology and paleogeography that there was potential. They explored – often muddy, (particularly in lowland basins and coastal plains) – sites by foot. 

What followed was a “discovery of such a diverse and well-preserved set of artefacts, which exceeded our expectations,” Dr Karahan says.  

Although these recovery efforts were not without challenges, the authors explore what both the challenges and findings reveal in the paper.  
They state: “The widespread, muddy cover was considered a limiting factor for the preservation and detectability of Paleolithic materials.  

“However, despite these constraints, high-quality raw material sources, such as flint and chalcedony, were identified in multiple locations, including areas affected by alluvial deposition.” 
 

Future potential  
 

Fellow author Dr Hande Bulut, from Düzce University, adds: “Ultimately the results underline Ayvalık’s potential as a long-term hominin habitat and a key area for understanding Paleolithic technological features in the eastern Aegean. 

“While preliminary, the current findings underscore the region’s potential to contribute to broader debates on Aegean connectivity and technological evolution during the Pleistocene. 

“Excitingly, the region between the North Aegean and the Anatolian mainland, may still hold valuable clues to early occupation despite the challenges posed by active geomorphological processes.” 

The team recommends future research uses a multidisciplinary approach to outline absolute dating, stratigraphic excavation, and paleoenvironmental reconstruction, which they describe as “essential to clarify the temporal depth and functional character of the Ayvalık assemblage”.  

Thursday, September 18, 2025

Bronze and Iron Age cultures in the Middle East were committed to wine production

 Farmers in the Middle East were more committed to wine production over olive growing during times of climatic change in the Bronze and Iron Ages, according to new research.

Archaeologists who analysed the charred remains of ancient plant samples found that irrigation was used to maintain grape cultivation as people prioritised viticulture.

Their findings provide evidence of the importance of wine production for cultural and economic purposes during that period.

The research, led by the University of Tübingen, Germany, and involving Durham University, UK, is published in the journal PLOS One.

The team looked at over 1,500 seed and wood samples from grape and olive plants from the Early Bronze Age to the Iron Age (5,000 to 2,600 years before today).

The samples came from the Levant region and northern Mesopotamia, which today includes Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Syria, Turkey, and northern Iraq.

The researchers analysed the ratios of stable carbon isotopes – non-radioactive forms of carbon that do not decay over time – in the samples to see how much water was available as the plants grew.

During the Early Bronze Age evidence of water stress matched seasonal variations in moisture.

During later periods there was greater variability in water stress, while the presence of grapes and olives in drier regions indicated more widespread use of irrigation.

The analysis also showed evidence for intensive irrigation of grape crops since the Middle Bronze Age, as well as the presence of cultivated grapes in areas poorly-suited to growing the fruit.

This suggests that grapes and wine were of particular cultural and economic value, confirming the findings of previous archaeological research.

Research senior author Professor Dan Lawrence, in the Department of Archaeology, Durham University, said: “Olive and grape were key crops, providing both food for locals and exportable commodities which facilitated trade between the Levant and Mesopotamia, and beyond with Egypt, Turkey and the wider Mediterranean.

“Our research demonstrates that farmers in the Middle East thousands of years ago were making decisions about which crops to plant and how to manage them, balancing the risk of harvest failure with the effort needed to irrigate, and the likely demand for their products.

“It reminds us that people in the past were just as smart as people today, and that seemingly modern issues like resilience to climate change and the need to allocate resources carefully have long histories.”

Grape and olive farming traditions have changed through time based on shifts in climate and the needs of the local culture, according to a study published September 17, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Simone Riehl of the University of Tübingen, Germany and colleagues.

Throughout human history, olives and grapes have been important crops thanks to their nutritional value, symbolic significance, and key role in the production of valuable trading goods such as olive oil and wine. The availability of these crops, however, has fluctuated over time with changes to culture and climate. In this study, Riehl and colleagues compiled data from archaeological sites across the Levant and northern Mesopotamian regions to assess how agricultural practices have changed over time.

The authors analyzed over 1,500 seed and wood samples from the Early Bronze Age to the Iron Age, measuring stable isotopes of carbon as an indicator of moisture availability during the growth of the plants. During the Early Bronze Age, evidence of water stress matches seasonal moisture variations, but during later periods, greater variability in water stress and the presence of these crops in drier regions indicates more widespread use of irrigation practices. Periods of increased crop stress also line up with well-documented climate fluctuations.

These results provide a wealth of new data for examining how agricultural practices have been impacted over time by changing climates and farming techniques. Since the Middle Bronze Age, abundant evidence for intense irrigation of grape crops, as well as the presence of cultivated grapes even in poorly-suited climate zones, indicates a stronger commitment to viticulture compared to other crops such as olives. This pattern suggests that grapes and wine were of particular cultural and economic value, consistent with previous archaeological research.

The authors add: “Our research demonstrates that farmers in Southwest Asia 4,000 years ago were making decisions about which crops to plant and how to manage them, balancing the risk of harvest failure with the effort needed to irrigate, and the likely demand for their products. It reminds us that people in the past were just as smart as people today, and that seemingly modern issues like resilience to climate change and the need to allocate resources carefully have long histories.” 

 

 The freely available article in PLOS Onehttp://plos.io/3JBtHad